Conflicting Directives: a Work Tale
Large
Companies: Working Against themselves
Last night
I was told as I took shift that we could probably
expect a visit from our Corporate Internal Theft/
Loss Prevention division. Well this makes the night a
little harder than usual, because now we have to dot
all our I’s and cross all our T’s, but then we also
have to go and initial that we did that & get
verification that we did indeed dot & cross and
initial those I’s and T’s.
And it struck me: the business model is flawed. We
don’t do on a daily basis what the Loss Prevention
department would have us do. We can’t. If we followed
all those directives, we’d not get anything done that
is needed to get done to move product out and get the
store shoppable. We just can’t, it takes too much
time to be so tight-fisted on every front. Obviously
the simple answer to all of that is “schedule more
people,” and I agree, except that we’re also on hour
budgets, so we can’t. If we schedule more people, we
go over-budget on man-hours, and we get raked over
the coals for that. And that’s when I realized that
there’s this disconnect between the people designing
the directives and the ones carrying them out.
They’re not carried out is the trick, because it’s
simply not possible to complete the overall mission
and actually follow all the conflicting directions.
No one ever tells the higher-ups how it really works,
because they don’t want to be hung out to dry.
Because honestly, if one store steps out when no
others complain? Then it seems they’re mismanaged,
because no one else complained, so they get
reprimanded, which stands as a good testament to the
other stores as to
why they shouldn’t mention
it.
So the Loss Prevention Department works to restrict
sales and efficiency. And the Sales and Marketing
department works to grow sales and efficiency. They
collide. Fun ensues.
Pomp & Circumstance
I also
thought, however, that it might be a necessity. As
in, perhaps they do indeed know that their directives
step all over one another. In a perfect world, maybe
it would all be possible to do. However, I thought
that perhaps the district personnel know that it’s an
utter impossibility to toe the line and still meet
sales objectives. Perhaps they know it’s all a show
when they’re in town….
What I was thinking was that, even though we can’t
follow the rules as strictly as they’re set, maybe
it’s like aiming for the moon. Sure you’ll never get
it, but by setting the goal at that level, you are
more likely to stay in a “middle ground” that is
acceptable. I mean, I thought to myself,
why don’t they relax the rules and let us do our
jobs? But then I
thought, if they did relax the rules, probably a
great many stores would not be as close to the
standard as they now are; lowering the standards
typically lowers performance, even if you’re simply
lowering the standard to the current, sustainable
level of performance. See “No Child Left
Behind” for
the point.
Maybe? Maybe that’s what it is? Maybe it is all show
& go… They show up, we do the little dance so
they know how important they are, and then they go….
And we get back to doing our jobs.
I think that may be it.