spiders. no.
ashton
kutcher attempts acting; moviegoers plot revenge
so can we
like, start a petition to have this guy’s acting
license revoked? how many screens does he have to
stink up before they stop hiring him for films? get
this straight: he’s a two-bit character actor that
can barely pull off an idiot, something he’s highly
qualified to be in real life. and he can barely pull
it off on a camera. yet we try –over and over – to
show the world that he’s more than a skinny tweaker
from the 70’s or something. ok, so let’s review the
current state of asston cooter’s fuckups -- er,
films: 1) dude, where’s my dildo, a live-action
portrayal of bert & ernie high on crack. two
thumbs way down. 2) my bosses dildo, a
heart-wrenching screenplay of gay aiken’s touching
ballad, invisible fag. again, two thumbs way down. 3)
the dildo effect, a gripping psychological thriller
about a boy who travels back and forth through time
to find his long-lost dildo. two thumbs down. and
now, 4) the dildo, a teary-eyed drama about a large,
blunt object at sea, drowning in an ocean of suck.
two thumbs down. again. ray charles could see this
pattern developing in a dark room with a blindfold
on. while dead. Seriously, who’s going to see The
Guardian? Raise you hands so I can aim.
so about that petition? keep on eye on your email, i
think i’m going to do like that gas tax one and the
no illegal immigrants one, where you put your name on
it and the last person to get it sends it to the
white house or something. shit, i think bush really
should take some time out of his busy vacation
schedule to tackle this national crisis. seriously,
before more innocent eyes are tortured. for the kids,
dammit! and while we’re at it, should we, say... ask
for costner’s retirement? it’s been like 20 years
since he attempted fourplay with canines or whatever
it was, and seriously he hasn’t done much since then,
except for age not-so-well in front of our eyes. and
one has to wonder, how much of that aging is due to
sucking in large suck-fest movies? has to take a toll
on you, know what i mean?
chevron
takes show on the road, tickets on sale now!
as us
californians know, it’s time for the airwaves to
thicken with advertisements (for you brits out there,
that’s ad-ver-tis-ments) for various propositions,
which for those of you without a clue is a time for
us regular-folk to vote on important issues that can
bypass the legislature. one of vital importance this
time around is prop 87, a state-imposed gas tax which
directs funds to alternative fuels research. sounds
good, right? know what sounds better? chevron trying
to make it sound bad.
see, the basic idea of the prop is to make gas
companies pay for the research without passing on the
cost to consumers. but, to here chevron spin it?
night at the improv, i swear. the commercial starts
out with a woman filling up her oversized
su-fucing-v, asking us if we’ve heard about the new
proposition. then she explains most of the points,
and the viewer is thinking “wow, this sounds great!
I’m all for it!” and then the chevron lady says... “i
don’t think so....” and leaves the whole audience
just confused, and then goes on to say how this is
the wrong time for this and it’s just bad, just
because she said so at the beckoning of a large oil
firm. and at some point, you start laughing because
it’s just so wrong and so not true, that you can’t
help but wonder how the hell she kept a straight face
for the whole taping. or maybe she didn’t, what do I
know. maybe she had to do like 15 hits off the peace
pipe and 30 takes of film later to get that scene
out. or maybe high-dose tranquilizers and they edited
out the drooling? toss up, i know.
but the important thing to remember here is, yes to
prop 87. and stick it to the gas companies. they’re
rich enough, let’s get something going to get us off
their black crack.
peace.