Workout Laughter, Vogue & LeBron, & a good internet video
Haha
funny NO!
Today I
got in my workout. Yay for me, except that I had to
laugh at myself once I was damn near through.
See, I had started doing my back exercises, and I
felt
really strong. So I
upped the weight a little, then a little more… 20
pounds more than I would normally do. Like, 20 pounds
more than I would have done the last time I did them.
That’s quite an improvement! Trust me!
Well it seemed like quite an improvement. Until I was
damn near done, and I realized that I had put on the
25lb plates instead of the 35lb plates I normally
use. Whoops!
Anyway, I guess it goes to show that I know my limits
rather well. (2x25+20=70; 2x35=70).
The
Guffaw over LeBron & Vogue
I got a
glimpse of the “provacative” Vogue Cover
featuring LeBron James &
Giselle Bundchen (she’s
hot btw). But have you heard all the ruckus
over
the perceived “racial overtones” of the cover? You
know, that it portrays black males in a “vicious
manner,” with an angry face and “clutching” a
helpless white woman…
I know it sounds absurd, but in reality I see where
they’re coming from. It DOES look like a scene from
King Kong (the good version, not
the “Jack Black’s in it totally f*cking it
up version.”
I hate Jack Black, btw). What would have been so bad
about him being dressed to the nines? He could have
still held a ball or something. Why have him in such
an “active” stance, with such a scowl on his face
(yes I know he’s almost smiling, but still it’s not a
“hi nice to see you” sort of appearance either)?
They may not have necessarily meant it in that way,
but they should have nabbed that before it went to
print. Voque’s been around awhile, their covers are
usually pretty well-conceived; this might not have
been intentional, but it probably wasn’t an accident,
either.
Did
you see this video yet?
If you
know me personally, then I already emailed it to you.
But if you don’t know me personally, then maybe you
haven’t seen this video.
It’s a rather lengthy video by internet standards
(upwards of 20 minutes), but also very important.
It’s also very spot-on. I’ve been saying essentially
the same thing for years, and I’ve seen how people
tune out; it’s funny how quickly people will bury
their heads in the sand and just claim ignorance, so
they can continue being someone else’s pawn.
Anyway, I didn’t learn anything from the video. Which
isn’t to say that I’m smarter than anyone, only
saying that it’s not news, if you’ve listened to me
you may recognize some of what the narrator says. But
it’s put together well, and ties a lot of things
together nicely.
Definitely worth checking out. What
are you waiting for? Click already!
Peace.
Dems & The Housing Market, & Gas for Workouts
I
don’t get the Dems sometimes
They keep
on saying that we need to bail out the damn mortgage
industry, some
sort of “economic stimulus” plan, prop it all up
with some $30 billion. I just don’t get it.
To me, it would seem that amounts to perpetuating the
republican agenda. I mean, the dems didn’t create the
housing boom, it serves the purpose of keeping most
of the people (whom they’re supposed to be “for”) out
of one of the biggest facets of the American Dream…
yet they keep right on going for that. Election year
politics? Man, f*ck.
Sorry, but propping up the housing market serves no
one except the people looking to turn around and sell
for profit sometime soon. The market’s overvalued,
and if they prop it up and keep the prices
artificially high, then they’re locking soooo many
low-income families out of the possibility of ever
owning the roof over their heads.
This is decidedly
not a
democratic ideal. I don’t know what the hell they’re
thinking. I actually – GASP! – agree with McCain
on this
one.
Workout
stories
I haven’t
worked out much recently. I was hit
by the flu bug,
albeit not too hard. But then I just sort of never
got much better for the better part of two weeks,
and only recently got good enough to lift
frequently. Like, 3 days ago.
One thing I noticed during my hiatus: lack of gas.
Yeah, that gas. Almost as soon as I got back on the
bandwagon though, the gas came back. And it hit me: I
may not be as naturally gassy as I feared myself to
be; it may be a byproduct of the whey protein
supplement I take when I work out. Er, used to take.
I have been off it for almost two weeks and haven’t
had any issues, so I am going to try getting on it
again, see if the gas reappears. If so? Then I’m
screwed.
More specifically, my wallet’s screwed. Because it’s
not like I’m going to not lift. Rather, I’m going to
have to relegate myself to actually
eating the
protein I need, as opposed to drinking it on the
cheap. And it’s not like I don’t enjoy the eating.
It’s just a bit more expensive.
So if you’re a workout buff and you think gas is just
a way of life for you? Maybe not. It may just be a
“whey” of life. May be another point to the old
adage, “you get what you pay for.” No way to cheap
out on the weight gain either, apparently. At least
for me.
Peace.
Atonement, & another Celeb F'ed up Bodypart
Seen:
Atonement
We ran out
of things to do on Monday night, so we popped into
the video store down the street and rented
Atonement.
It’s set in WWII-era England, involving a love story
gone awry. Two lovers, torn apart by the vindictive
accusations of a little girl, separated by time in
jail and a horrific war, but most of all by the
jealousy of a young girl.
It’s a good movie almost all the way around. We were
actually warned by The Girl’s grandmother
just before we sat to plop it in, that it a)
wasn’t all that good, and b) there was some
‘raunchy’ sex scene in a kitchen. Now, we usually
take movie recommendations from her with a grain
of salt, if not a shaker-full. Good thing, too
because she wasn’t quite right on either front.
Firstly, the movie’s not that bad. It’s overall a
fairly well-done flick, if a little rough at the
end.
Secondly, the raunchy sex scene? In the Library, not
the kitchen. And furthermore, it wasn’t even raunchy!
Odd perhaps, but far from raunchy. I’ve seen
raunchier on TV. This was not raunchy. It was
actually kind of understated & intriguing.
For me, the worst part of the movie was the ending.
You go along with the story, you hope they find each
other, then it seems they did. But then you quickly
learn that they never did, they died, and the part
you just saw was the imagination of the vindictive
little girl – now 143 years old – in her new novel,
Atonement, an “autobiography” of her horrible act.
She explains in an interview that those moments were
in fact how she wrote it out of her imagination, to
give them the time together they never had (because
the died, victims of the war, a continent apart).
That sucks enough, but then she keeps talking, and it
keeps sucking more. Oh now she tells us that she
doesn’t think of it as a cheap ploy, a copout, she
thinks its what they would have wanted. You know, for
her to be a famous writer at the expense of their
love & lives. Yeah, they wanted to die apart. So
you could ‘imagine’ them together. Yeah.
Newsflash: It IS a cheap ploy. It WAS a copout. You
ARE a raving bitch. And this catastrophic ending, in
which you teased us with happiness – no, gave it to
us and then ripped it from our grasp – was a complete
disaster. We’d have rather have just received the
bitter ending without the soft buildup.
But aside from the ending, it’s quite alright,
cheerio! I’d give it a
straight B.
F’ed
up Celebrities we’re allowed to mention, part 2
So one
star in this film is well-known for her good looks.
Not so much known for her f*cked up eye, though.
Yeah, Keira Knightley has a
f*cked up eye I noticed, and again, it seems no
one is allowed to mention it. It struck me – like,
popped out of the screen and almost hit me – in a
café scene where she meets her lover after a
3-year hiatus that he spent in prison. She’s
standing there in her blue ‘thing’ that she’s
wearing, and her face just fills up the screen
with a “deer in the headlights” sort of look. And
that’s when it almost hit me: her left eye is
noticeably bigger and higher than her right. I
mean, the camera was slightly off-center to her
right, making that eye closer to the screen to
begin with, yet still her left eye just dominated
the screen. It was eerie. Or, well, eye-ie or
something.
Not saying she’s not a beauty, no one’s perfect, but
still, why can’t these things be mentioned?
I mean honestly, her eye doesn’t really bother me.
But MAN,
Joaquin’s f*cked up shoulders bug the
living hell out of me.
Peace.
We Own the Night, Joaquin's F'ed up Shoulder, & Archives
Seen:
We Own the Night
Netflix
sent this our direction and we partook of it. It’s
not too bad. It’s a crime drama, there’s really not
much more to say about it. It’s not breaking new
ground. The Russian Mafia is sneaking in dope to New
York, the cops are trying to stop it, war ensues.
Nothing new.
There were a few irritating parts, though. It’s hard
to explain without giving the whole movie as
background, but if you were in a car behind two cars
having a shootout, and one was your friends & the
others were not? Would you merely speed up to see it?
Or would you, say,
try to spin the other car
out? Well
apparently we only get the option to watch here.
And the final act. You’d think that if cops had a
place surrounded, this would mean they had the
place surrounded.
Apparently not. Nope, here, surrounded means “ok
we’re at the front door, please don’t a) shoot at
us or b) run out the back doors, thanks.” So yeah
there’s a few little dumb things, but the one
thing that bothered me most about it was
Joaquin Phoenix trying
to become a cop…
It's OK. It's not the best, not the worst, yet as
much as it's viewable, it's also passable. I
say
C+. It's a
fair assessment. I'm being fair on that.
F’ed
up Celebrities we're not allowed to mention, Part 1
Why is it
that no one talks about Joaquin’s fucked up shoulder?
I was curious as to what it was, but there’s,
like,
nothing I could
find about it. Like it’s a taboo subject or
something. Or like everyone’s trying to pretend that
no one notices.
Yeah right! C’mon, it’s plain as day! He has a f*cked
up left shoulder, dammit! He can’t be a cop! He can’t
pass the physical! What the hell!? Why does all of
Hollywood ignore this fact?
I want to see a parody of his Johnny Cash Performance
in Walk the line. You know how they replayed over
& over that “hello, I’m Johnny Cash” line? Yeah
well I want to see a skit where someone comes out
being him being Cash, and says, “Hello, I have a
f*cked up shoulder.”
Can we at least admit it’s there? We can all see the
elephant, right?
Archives
updated
OK so I
did finish my updating of the Archive. However, I did
get a little lazy about it. Well, not really lazy,
just all historical and stuff.
See, there were some entries I came across that the
links were simply too good to get rid of, and there
were too many to worry about reformatting everything.
Blogs like
this one, about
Michael Jackson’s 50-foot tall
robot with lasers for eyes. So I
compromised. I did reformat the spacing to match, but
I left the text as it was. So some entries will be a
slightly different size & font.
And for the record, I’m never going to do this again.
They’re stayin the way they are. That was too damn
boring, and I’ll be damned if I ever do that again.
Peace.
Archives, Movies recently viewed, & Miles' Health
Almost
Done!
As of
right now, I am nearing completion of the old blog
updates. It was actually made easier with the
realization that not all would need so much work. I
knew I wanted to add an introductory pic for each
entry, and a lot were missing, but that’s relatively
easy, it’s the text that is the labor.
I have been using this basic “format” since about
August of last year, and even before that, I used
only a slightly modified version of what I’m
currently using. So theoretically, once I get to
about June 2007, I’m all but through. I say
theoretically because
had I gone straight through
chronologically, that
would be true. However once I skipped ahead to see
where I’d have to go to, I started just fixing those
small issues to break the monotony of the full-fix
entries…
So right now, I have about 2 months of full-fixers,
and say one month of slight-fixers.
Seen 2 movies, no reviews
I have
seen both Atonement &
We Own the Night, and
not blogged about either. Those are forthcoming,
don’t worry. But I think they will wait until I’m
done with the archival updates.
On
a sadder note
Miles had
been looking a little injured a few days ago.
Wasn’t sure, couldn’t figure it out, but he seemed
to get suddenly better, I figured maybe he was
constipated, who knows. Anyway, off to the beach
yesterday, and now he really is injured. Threw the
ball along the sand, and I guess he twisted his
front right ankle in a funky motion to grab the
ball off the ground as re ran passed it.
He’s doing better this morning already, but still….
I was talking with The Girl about
how I react differently when Zoey &
Miles get injured. I do tend to act more
“concerned” when Miles is involved. And it’s not
that I don’t care about Zoey, it’s that I know
Zoey is young and it’s “just” and injury. Miles is
11-½ years old; is this “just” and injury, or the
beginning of the end, you know? So yeah, I am
always very concerned with his health, because the
older he gets, the less likely he is to bounce
back. I know this. I don’t want to admit it, but I
know it.
I mean, a week sidelined? No problem for a young dog.
For him? He’s really active, but if he has to go a
week just sitting around, then it takes a bigger toll
on him. The next time out he may injure something
else.
I may need to get him on a stretching regimen. Maybe
enroll him in Yoga classes or something.
Peace.
Some Archives updated!
OK
the rework as begun
I did
start reformatting my older blog posts to match the
current renditions. Normally something like this
would be way too mundane for me, but they were
so bad I just
couldn’t stand linking back to them. I mean, these
have a bit of style & substance to them, but the
old ones? Well you could tell I copied them out quick
fast and in a hurry, not taking the time to pretty
the text up any when I made the move to this new
software.
They’re still not right. They haven’t been since day
one. A lot of the links were lost, and there’s not
much I can do about that except rebuild them, and to
be honest? There’s no way I’m going to do that. Sorry
Charlie. So if you’re reading along and it seems like
I’m probably referencing something and you can’t find
it? Yeah that’s probably why. A link gone with the
wind or some sh!t like that.
Still
some to go though
I’m
takling my time on this, I decided. I originally was
going to just go without blogging for a few days so I
could put that time to fixing the old. But it occurs
to me now that my archives will take longer than
anticipated, so I’m doing it in waves. Right now, I’m
through October
2006. Maybe
by later I’ll have gone up to 2007. Who knows how
long it’ll take.
But it’s not like you were going to read them anyway,
so it’s all the same to you, huh?
Peace.
Happy Easter!
Happy
Easter!
Well, uh,
unless you’re not Christian. Or Catholic.
In which case,
Happy Sunday!
A
slight Lull perhaps?
There may
be some time delay for the next update. I wanted to
go back and reformat some of my old blog posts (from
before I switched software; the formatting stinks!).
Doing so, however, requires time. Time not spent
writing new blogs. So everyone that doesn’t read my
blog anyway? Yeah, you guys will not have a new entry
to not read for a little bit. Oh so sorry for the
inconvenience.
Peace.
Conflicting Directives: a Work Tale
Large
Companies: Working Against themselves
Last night
I was told as I took shift that we could probably
expect a visit from our Corporate Internal Theft/
Loss Prevention division. Well this makes the night a
little harder than usual, because now we have to dot
all our I’s and cross all our T’s, but then we also
have to go and initial that we did that & get
verification that we did indeed dot & cross and
initial those I’s and T’s.
And it struck me: the business model is flawed. We
don’t do on a daily basis what the Loss Prevention
department would have us do. We can’t. If we followed
all those directives, we’d not get anything done that
is needed to get done to move product out and get the
store shoppable. We just can’t, it takes too much
time to be so tight-fisted on every front. Obviously
the simple answer to all of that is “schedule more
people,” and I agree, except that we’re also on hour
budgets, so we can’t. If we schedule more people, we
go over-budget on man-hours, and we get raked over
the coals for that. And that’s when I realized that
there’s this disconnect between the people designing
the directives and the ones carrying them out.
They’re not carried out is the trick, because it’s
simply not possible to complete the overall mission
and actually follow all the conflicting directions.
No one ever tells the higher-ups how it really works,
because they don’t want to be hung out to dry.
Because honestly, if one store steps out when no
others complain? Then it seems they’re mismanaged,
because no one else complained, so they get
reprimanded, which stands as a good testament to the
other stores as to
why they shouldn’t mention
it.
So the Loss Prevention Department works to restrict
sales and efficiency. And the Sales and Marketing
department works to grow sales and efficiency. They
collide. Fun ensues.
Pomp & Circumstance
I also
thought, however, that it might be a necessity. As
in, perhaps they do indeed know that their directives
step all over one another. In a perfect world, maybe
it would all be possible to do. However, I thought
that perhaps the district personnel know that it’s an
utter impossibility to toe the line and still meet
sales objectives. Perhaps they know it’s all a show
when they’re in town….
What I was thinking was that, even though we can’t
follow the rules as strictly as they’re set, maybe
it’s like aiming for the moon. Sure you’ll never get
it, but by setting the goal at that level, you are
more likely to stay in a “middle ground” that is
acceptable. I mean, I thought to myself,
why don’t they relax the rules and let us do our
jobs? But then I
thought, if they did relax the rules, probably a
great many stores would not be as close to the
standard as they now are; lowering the standards
typically lowers performance, even if you’re simply
lowering the standard to the current, sustainable
level of performance. See “No Child Left
Behind” for
the point.
Maybe? Maybe that’s what it is? Maybe it is all show
& go… They show up, we do the little dance so
they know how important they are, and then they go….
And we get back to doing our jobs.
I think that may be it.
What Happened in Hollywood?
Reviewing
my netflix queue pointed out some peculiarities
to me. Yes I love movies, but especially good
ones. And there seems to be a rather big drought
in “good” movies of recent. And I’m sure my
taste plays a part in it. For me, it’s not just
the acting that makes a good movie, it’s also
the story. And I don’t really care if it’s a
far-fetched story, as long as it’s complete and
told well. It should evoke emotion without plot
holes big enough to swallow the emotion it’s
going for. And there’s automatic deductions for
“cute,” too.
Today’s movies are in large part not up to this task.
It’s hard to remember the last movie I saw that I
thought was
good.
The Departed? It
was a good movie. What the hell do I recall since
then? Well there was The Prestige that
came out, but that was the same damn month in 2006
so that doesn’t count.
A SAMPLE MOVIES I DEARLY LIKE
-
Shrek (Original only)
MOVIES I WAS SUPPOSED TO LIKE (BUT DID NOT)
-
Michael Clayton (sorta)
So you see any patterns? Probably not. My tastes are wide and varied, you wouldn’t think someone that loved When Harry & Shawshank would also be gaga over 300 and The Matrix. And you’d think that someone that loved 300 would have been itching to see the new Rambo, but I refuse to see that schtick. But that’s me. I enjoy a good story, and I’m not against a popcorn flick as long as the story’s complete and well-told (and well acted, Nicholas Cage…). I like futuristic stuff; that doesn’t knock points for me, if it’s done in a ‘real,’ ‘gritty’ sort of way that conveys the right points & attitudes & emotions. As long as it’s not corny, I think that’s the real issue for me. The Matrix rocked. Yes it had some awesome action sequences, but it also had such a deep, engaging story that even the most famous of philosophers have been in a deep struggle to get a handle on the finer points of it (see Brain in a Vat, Descartes' Evil Genius, & The Cave Allegory).
And comedies? Hey I love comedies, and one would think that a Wedding Crashers fan would have adored the 40 y/o Virgin, but you see that on my “hate” list. It’s a one-trick pony. It’s the same penis joke. For two hours. OK, we get it, he’s a virgin, now come up with a new joke for god’s sake. Yes, even god hated that movie and that it was trifling.
So what do I think is wrong with movies today? They assume, I think. And I don’t mean that in a singular sense, as in “they assume we will see a movie with with Morgan Freeman in it,” though I mean that as well. I also mean that they assume that just the act of putting that person in the flick will somehow make their movie riveting and Oscar-worthy.
And on the same note, just because you put out a popcorn flick in the Summer does not guarantee a wild reception. Transformers? Will not see it. I repeat, will NOT see that drivel. And if you want to know exactly why, take a good look at this site’s commentary on the matter (one of my favorites on the web, btw). They assume that a noir theme automatically garners their film a place in the noir hall of fame. They assume that just because George Clooney is a renowned actor, if they put him in their film it’s suddenly serious and poignant, even if the role is superfluous at best (see Syriana).
They also assume that mass appeal equals critical acclaim, or at least that it should. Sunshine? Man it started out great, but it failed as soon as they introduced a “monster mayhem” theme during the last 30 minutes. But hey, that’s mass-market, right? People love slasher flicks, right? So it must only make the movie better, right? Right? Uh, no.
And I’m sorry, but just because Kevin Costner was in Foreplay with Canines does not mean that you can team him up with Asston Cooter and still have a good movie (reference to The Guardian). Sorry guys, doesn’t work like that.
Back to the drawing board, huh? It would seem to me that Hollywood’s been riding on the coattails of it’s storied past for too long.
Peace.
Viewed: Michael Clayton
What
is Michael Clayton? Michael Clayton is…
Erin Brockovich. But
not as good. It's
Erin Brockovich for
Clooney fans. How is it not as good? Well in
Erin, we feel
like we are connected with the characters. The
villains have a past, we are tracing it. We get to
know them. The plaintiffs have a face, but more than
that, they have emotion and again, we feel like we
have a connection to them. We see their sufferance,
we have empathy for them. We know where the main
characters come from, where they are going, and why.
It feels very ‘real.’
Clayton?
Not so much on all those points. The characters are
never fleshed out, you have no real view into what
makes them who they are; what makes them tick?
Erin covers
more time, gives you more background and a better
connection to the characters, whilst
Clayton spans
about 4 days and you feel like you still don’t know
these people.
It’s kind of funny how they run the same span of time
(about 2-hours), yet
Erin pulls it
off while
Clayton feels
half-assed by comparison, despite the stretch of time
each deals with in-film.
That’s not to say that
Michael Clayton is not a
good movie. The acting’s good, the cinematography is
good, but there’s no “wow” factor. That and you’re
constantly in the middle of a befuddled mess, and
don’t understand everyone. Why is
Michael Clayton a “fixer,”
again? Because I never saw him fix anything, seems
his title is merely granted for the role. How about
some character development? Show him “fixing”
something, perhaps? Make us believe he’s as good as
you’re telling us, because we’re not seeing it, Mr.
Directors & Writers.
I don’t know why rotten tomatoes would have
Erin rated @ 84%,
and Clayton rated @
91%.
Myself I’d reverse those. And maybe still knock a
few points off of Clooney’s interpretation.
B-.
Peace.
Using the Whacker, & Organic Chicken
OK
I lied. But just a little. And I didn’t know.
I
said earlier that I
wasn’t going to get to play with my new weed wacker
until tomorrow. But I lied.
Around 3pm or so the rain cleared and never came
back. So I changed my schedule around to accommodate
a workout that was unplanned (did chest & back
yesterday; usually too sore to do shoulders the
following day), and in between sets I managed to get
in some wacking of weeds. Yes, now the back and front
yards are completely edged, and everything’s looking
just that much better! Yay.
Organic
Chicken: it haz a flavur
You know
those jokes, everything tastes like chicken, chicken
tastes like everything, everything tastes like
nothing…? Well if you’d never eaten fresh,
organic,
free-range chicken,
you might agree with this. God knows we (me and The
Girl) did. She so much as disliked chicken before.
But now? Now it’s a staple. We don’t even marinate
it. Just throw it on the grill, baste it, and serve.
It’s that good. Its has an actual taste, so once you
get below the top layer that
actually absorbed the baste,
it still tastes wonderful.
Really. You should try it. Remember, though:
Organic,
free-range. Those
are important. They will make all the difference.
Trust me. Trust the ‘bob.
Peace.
PostScript:
The “it haz a flavur" is slang from
“teh
intarwebs,”
in reference to “lolcats.”
just in case you were wondering. You weren’t but I
thought I’d share.
Weed Wacker, Michael Clayton, Edit Edit
BAM!
New toy
Yesterday I caved in and bought a “weed wacker.” I had been avoiding it, having purchased an old-fashioned “walk it along the sidewalk edger” and making do with that.
Problem
was, it was hard/difficult/impossible to edge any
area that (a)the grass was lower than the sidewalk,
so nothing “laid over” it to cut, or (b)there was no
sidewalk to walk it along. I did the scissors/shears
thing for a while, but as I recently
hoed the back to give it
a break betwixt grass & fence, I had much, much
more area that fell into category (b).
I haven’t tried to yet. It’s raining. But I’m so
happy already. I play tomorrow.
Movie
for the night: Michael Clayton
I keep
getting lucky with my
Netflix Queue.
Last week I got pushed ahead to see
No Country for Old
Men, which
was a ‘Long Wait.’ This week, I get
Michael Clayton,
another well-received flick that was listed as a
‘Wait’ title.
Well at least I hope I’m getting lucky. I mean,
I
didn’t particularly care for No
Country, so I’m
trying to lower my expectations for Clooney’s outing
here.
Edit:
Actually I
should say that I did not break down and buy a week
wacker; rather, I sent The Girl out to
to get me one. So I caved and
she bought.
That’s more correct.
Edit:
Someone on
the web pointed out to me a typo on my
Miles Bio page
yesterday. I was missing a period (oh no I’m
late!) at the end of the first paragraph. I
thanked this person, and they requested that I
give them proper credit. So here it goes:
The random bob, a.r.c. Miles Bio Page
Proofread & edited by Action Jaxan, WEE (Web
Editor Extraordinaire). Real name redacted to
protect the innocent.
Personally I just like having made up the 'WEE.'
Makes me laugh every time. I imagine a wee little
tyke going down a slide. WEE… How fun.
Oh and I also took the time to add some more pics,
since I was there fixing typos. Added some to
the Family
Album, as
well!
Peace.
Star Wars Rants: Clone Wars, do-overs
What
a concept
George
Lucas doing Star Wars: The Clone Wars
as
an animated special. Not.
A. Bad. Idea! I mean, now you don’t have to worry
about Hayden
Christensen sucking
up all the quality of the movie with his “acting,”
as he calls it, and you can do all the special
effects you want without it looking like it
doesn’t belong! What a freaking great idea!
Now if we could only get someone else to read his
scripts, modify them, and take a decent idea and hone
it into a decent movie experience. Sort of act as a
liaison between George’s crazy skull and the viewing
public, making sure that we aren’t subjected to
crap-for-movies. Obviously George Lucas cannot do
this, see exhibit’s
A,
and
B, and
also
C.
And just for the record, let me get this off my
chest: F*ck Jar-Jar Binks. F*ck
that thing in the ear. F*ck it in the nose. Make a
new hole in its head and f*ck it there, too. F*ck
it until it bleeds and dies. Then pick it up and
slap George Lucas across the face with its
bleeding ass for having “created” such a poor
excuse for a character.
Speaking
of Star Wars
Know what?
Despite the Lucas-bashing (totally deserved, btw), I
like the concept of the Star Wars saga. I’d love to
see it redone someday, with actual quality acting,
and actual quality special effects, all tied together
nicely. I imagine a more noir style, a little more
serious tone perhaps, but humor notwithstanding. I
mean, a laugh here and there is good, but I’d totally
get rid of the “kiddie” aspects of it. Think
something along the lines of Star Wars done in the
style of LOTR, or
the original Matrix
(but
without the techno soundtrack). Dark, stylistic,
with a point and most importantly,
no gaping plot holes. It’d be a
gas to behold, methinks.
Peace.
Awkward work moment, & Decór critique
Awkward
moment…